
( continued from last week)
N E G O T I A T I O N S
In the second part of my contribution, I have been able to show
the first category of advices given by experts to negotiators. The
second area of advice was about beginning the negotiation, per se.
What they warned was to make the opening scene firm and valid so
that one would think of the agenda seriously and to watch the physical
arrangements. They say the overture should make music in order to
bring about friendship.
While coming to the third area, i.e. to the hard-talk, they go on
advising to control information and to watch one’s language.
They advise not to overplay persuasion so that it will not paint
one’s argument with the wrong material or impression. They
strongly uphold the importance of taking time out. Going behind
the scene—that is, where minds are changed is considered vital
for the success of negotiations.
It is said that a deadlock is possible and both sides may lose.
They advise to walk away in such a case rather than brow heated
into a bad deal. But, one important piece of advice they underline
is to get an agreement signed before one leaves.
In their last piece of advice, i.e. beyond the contract, they warn
that discussions are always preferable to court settlement; and
to remember, without a relationship, there is no deal.
This shows us how negotiation is a very serious and a hard piece
of work. Scholars have attempted to show how the word “negotiation”
itself has evolved through times. They tell us the orgin of the
word dates back to some 2000 years, when the ancient Romans used
the word “negotiari” meaning “to carry on business.”
The word originates from Latin. “Negotium” is the original
word; when split into two “neg” means “not”
and “otium” means “ease or leisure.” When
this is put into its modern context it shows us that “negotiation”
is a hard work and not at all leisure.
This is why globalization in the romance of world trade had to be
preceded by other phases of reality, yet, the transition form domestic
to global corporation may be described as some writers put it in
“four-stages: internationalization, multilatralization, transnationalization
and globalization.” Beyond that it is viewed only as a new
form of business that can only be guessed.
An international business becomes a reality when a domestic firm
begins the internationalization process—that is when it is
involved in direct and indirect exporting, licensing, franchising,
and when it enters into manufacturer’s contracts and technical
agreements and joint ventures. A business remains categorized as
international until it begins to invest directly in wholly-owned
foreign subsidiaries. Then, at some point after the subsidiaries
are build, a business becomes multinational but with its own different
features.
Conversely transnationalization is an advanced stage of multinationlization
in which individuals from the branch countries acquire partial ownership
of the MNC. While multinational corporations are nationally owned
and managed and sometimes owned and managed by persons of different
nationalities, transnational enterprises are internationally owned
and controlled. On the other hand, decision-making in transnational
firms is free from home country bias.
When it comes to globalization, the global corporations operate
as if the entire world were a single entity. It emphasizes global
operations over the domestic member. It selects the best people
available for management, regardless of nationality, and it locates
corporate headquarters anywhere in the world.
Finally, what needs to be discerned is that negotiation helps to
reach at an agreement, to resolve a problem or to manage conflict
internally and externally in order to come out of a situation as
competitor or friend. For all that, however, it should be remembered
that the skill of communication is intertwined with the art of negotiations.
|