Disappointed
We live in the land of 13 months of sunshine and where the smile
is at home. We just celebrated the beginning of a new millennium
and we bend over backwards to please. This is the land of origin
of coffee and enjerra, where we relax around coffee ceremonies and
enjoy weddings like nowhere else. Ethiopia is truly a land of rich
cultural diversity and dramatic geographical scenery throughout
the historical route and the Great Rift Valley. It is also the capital
of the African Union and hosts numerous international conferences.
Ethiopia must be an interesting place to visit indeed, according
to tour operators and travellers alike. The country has much to
offer to tourists and visitors from abroad and more than enough
to wish for the exploring traveller, who read so much about it in
anticipation and who invested much time and money to see it all
for himself.
I often meet people who came from far to visit some of the Ethiopian
exotic places and I am always curious to find out how they liked
their adventures, especially from those who took the effort to travel
deep into the countryside like South Omo for example, known to inhabit
so many unique tribes in their natural environment.
While they are normally quite enthusiastic about most of their journeys,
their tone changes when it comes to South Omo. More often than not
they come back disappointed, especially after braving the long and
uncomfortable ride into the heat and unknown. Leaving Addis Abeba
full of expectations, they come back disillusioned. What seems to
be going wrong here?
Typically, a number of four or five tourists are driven to their
destination in an older or newer 4wd vehicle, depending on the tour
operator chosen. Extra drinking water and food stuffs in the back
of the car and plastic jerry cans with fuel on the roof rack must
allow the party to go to places where there are no regular service
providers anymore. And while the visitors are under the impression
that they have just begun a most unique journey, they are driven
down the beaten track instead. Most tour operators take their clients
to the same places and villages en route and it is usually the same
communities that have the privilege to receive the visitors. After
years of doing so, the communities have learnt that they don’t
benefit much from the frequent visitors who leave them behind after
a short while in a cloud of dust anyway. So they developed a strategy
to get as much money out of them in the shortest possible time.
Money for photographs, that is. So aggressive has become their approach
that the visitors react by wanting to leave the place rather earlier
than later, while all they wanted was to be able to wonder around,
observe the people in their natural environment and perhaps have
a little conversation with some of them. The visitors are also forced
to pay for a local guide who normally does nothing and speaks no
English. Their own tour operator’s guide now watches helplessly
as their clients are confused by what is going on. He has taken
them there and apparently has no role to play here at all. Taking
the poverty levels and problems the local people face into account,
one can hardly blame them for trying to get some money out of their
rich and wealthy visitors. It is all but pleasant for both sides
though. The main cause for all this in my opinion is that while
the area and its people are main tourist attractions, they have
never been regarded as main stakeholders in the tourist sector.
And in any project I have observed over the years, there will be
no success without involving the local communities and allowing
them ownership over what is happening with and around them. Instead,
tour operators, travel agents, hotel and restaurants take it all
while the local people are not respected as main stakeholder. It
seems to me that all parties involved don’t really understand
each other and perhaps that is where we can begin to do something
about improving the situation. Most tourists are interested in learning
more about the people living in the area they are visiting. And
they most probably don’t mind paying, given the chance to
wonder around and take in the environment in peace. They would probably
be happy to pay more instead of getting irritated over the few Birr
demanded for every photograph they take. It is not only about photographs.
There is more that motivated them to make this long journey. There
seems to be no good understanding between the communities and the
tour operators either as both deal with the visitors in a most uncoordinated
way.
So what can be done to improve the situation?
Stakeholders must come together, meet, discuss and find ways so
that all can continue or some even begin to benefit from tourism
in their area. Stakeholders include the local communities in the
first place, the tour operators, hotels, restaurants and other service
providers. Tour operators and travel agents, who should know their
business, seem best placed to take the initiative in this. Some
good ideas may come out of brainstorming sessions, while the communities
may come up with suggestions and contributions never thought of
before. Imagine a local museum, where tourist can learn everything
there is to learn about local life, cultures, ceremonies etc. The
visit could be enriched by lectures and walking safaris though the
village and the bush. The children of tourists may be given the
chance to herd some animals for a while together with some of the
local kids or learn how to milk a cow. A campsite nearby will allow
the visitors to stay longer while the evening is lighted up by some
dance and music. The tourists will be more than willing to pay for
the package and benefits will go to the community, not only to the
individual who posed for a picture or to the travel agent who brought
them. A comprehensive visitors’ package can de developed as
is done in other countries. Why don’t we learn from experiences
elsewhere? It can be done, this much I am convinced of. But it must
be done together and with the communities included as major stakeholder.
The result of the effort could be a real win-win situation instead
of the loose-loose that it is now. Who will take up the challenge?
|