Saturday, October 4, 2025
Home Blog Page 3581

Controversial African dictatorial leaders

0

By Haile-Gebriel Endeshaw

It is unfortunate that almost all African countries do not have democratic leaders. Almost all leaders of the continent are either dictatorial or authoritative. It is hard for me to see consultative and participative leaders in this poor continent of ours. My argument is that if there were democratic leaders, citizens would lead much better lives.
I categorized our (African) dictatorial leaders in to two. Those who promote soft dictatorship and others who stick to harsh dictatorship. This is not a research-based conclusion. But I feel things are like that. Meaning, their dictatorship differs on its degree. The soft ones are serious on protecting the territorial integrity and unity of their countries. They do not practise favouritism among citizens. The other dictators who are labelled ‘harsh’ promote divisive politics… ethnic division… they highly show partiality against ethnic groups which do not belong to them. They don’t regard all people as equal citizens of the country. The important terms like equity, fairness and equality are not available in their dictionaries. They go to the extent of relinquishing territorial domain of their country to the neighbouring countries. They don’t give a damn to the wellbeing of their citizens residing in other countries… This type does not care whether the territorial integrity and unity of the country are protected or not. They are very braggart and big liars. So long as they get benefit, they will not put boundary to their harshness. They frequently execute their citizens including children, females and elderly people. They are in general with myopic attitude… Let’s take a brief look at few dictators of the continent including the controversial Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe.
Robert Mugabe was a leader of Zimbabwe. He is a kind of soft dictator as per my judgement. This is to indicate that he is not like the harsh dictators who are known to accomplish many detrimental activities against the sovereignty and wellbeing of their respective nations. Most Zimbabweans believe that Mugabe has dedicated himself to liberate them from British colonial and white minority rules. Many testify to the fact that earlier Mugabe worked hard to expand healthcare and education in his country. He has also been praised for the decisive measure he took to redistribute farmlands controlled by the minority white population to landless black population of Zimbabwe. During independence 39% of the land was owned by around 6,000 white large-scale commercial farmers. Some 4% was under the ownership of black small-scale commercial farmers. Sources indicate that 41% of the land was said to be commercial in which four million people lived in overcrowded conditions. This reality seemed to oblige Mugabe to take drastic action of redistributing the land to black people. Mugabe has also been regarded as a hero in many third world countries where he received a warm reception when travelling throughout Africa. “For many in Southern Africa, he remained one of the ‘grand old men’ of the African liberation movement”
Some, including the former Rhodesian (Zimbabwe) leader Ian Smith, say that Mugabe is a serious leader, diligent, hard-working, a voracious reader who used every minute of his time and not much given to laughter. Former British premier, Tony Blair, also bore witness to Mugabe’s remarkable “self-discipline, intelligence and appetite for hard work”. To Blair both Mugabe and Smith are “proud, brave, stubborn, charismatic…”.
Though Mugabe is regarded as an evil by white minority population in Zimbabwe and the western world, he showed sympathy to his enemies, the colonialists. Once he appointed two white ministers to his government. The other day he pleaded with the white minority not to flee. “Stay with us, please remain in this country and constitute a nation based on national unity.” He also taught black Zimbabweans that the wrongs of the past must be forgiven and forgotten. “…It could never be a correct justification that just because the whites oppressed us yesterday when they had power, the blacks must oppress them today because they have power…” This should be taken as a good lesson by African leaders who are promoting ethnic politics in their respective countries.
Mugabe has been known for his strong denunciation against internal intervention from western countries. Once while attending an ‘Earth Summit’, he bitterly said the following: “We have fought for our land, we have fought for our sovereignty, small as we are, we have won our independence and we are prepared to shed our blood … So, Blair keep your England, and let me keep my Zimbabwe.” Mugabe also slashed the current US president, Trump, making a witty remark against him. “May I say to the United States President, Mr. Trump, please blow your trumpet. Blow your trumpet in a musical way towards the values of unity, peace, cooperation, togetherness, dialogue, which we have always stood for.”
Many people enjoyed the funniest quotes produced by the former leader of Zimbabwe, Mugabe. “Cigarette is a pinch of tobacco rolled in a piece of paper with fire on one end and a fool on the other… Kenyans are good runners because corruption is always chasing them… If you are ugly, you are ugly. Stop talking about inner beauty; because men do not walk around with x-ray machines to see inner beauty… If you attended over 100 weddings in your life and are still single, you are not different from a canopy.”
Regarding the braggard and liar leaders of Africa, we can discuss the disparaging and pathetic works of two despotic leaders, Idi Amin Dada of Uganda and Jean Bedel Bokassa of Central African Republic. They have brought disgrace up on their nations and all black Africans. Both are known to murder thousands of their people. During their era, many innocent people were slaughtered, stabbed, smothered and chopped to death… They put the chopped remains of the victims in refrigerators and even were said to consume them. A book ‘Talk of the Devil’ names Bokassa “a cannibal”. “…French legionnaires dispatched from Paris to overthrow [Bokassa] in what was called ‘Operation Barracuda’ had been ordered to search the house… In the gigantic freezer adjacent to the kitchens they found dozens of human cadavers, most notably those belonging to the leaders of student organizations…”
Bokassa claimed that he was from royal family. “I am a son of a king,” he said. But the reality is that he was a son of a village chief not a king. “…former emperor boasted… about ranks, titles, hierarchies… ‘Of all African leaders I was the greatest. Why? Because I was the emperor. One step below me was the king of Morocco. A king and a great head of state. Then came all the others: simple presidents’…”
The other dictator, Idi Amin of Uganda, once a soldier with the rank of corporal in a Scottish regiment, has also made the continent a laughingstock. One day the finance minister of that country approached Idi Amin and told him that the government coffer was empty. “Idi Amin, a true African Caligula, exploded. ‘Why you ministers always come nagging to President Amin? You are stupid. If we have no money, the solution is very simple: you should print new money.’ The minister bowed, left the room and fled to London, thereby saving his skin”.
When Idi Amin was not on official visits, he loved writing telegrams. One day during the Watergate scandal, he wrote the following note to the then US president, Richard Nixon. “… ‘If your country does not understand you, come to Papa Amin who loves you. A kiss on both your cheeks.’ …”
In February 1975 Radio Kampala claimed that Buckingham Palace had received the following letter from Idi Amin: “My dear Queen, I intend to arrive in London for an official visit on August 4th this year, but I am writing now to give you time to make all the necessary preparations for my stay so that nothing important is omitted. I am particularly concerned about food, because I know that you are in the middle of a fearsome economic crisis. I would also like you to arrange for me to visit Scotland, Ireland and Wales to meet the heads of revolutionary movements fighting against your imperialist operation.”

You can reach the writer through gizaw.haile@yahoo.com

Education for all

Over the last two decades many schools targeting both higher and practical education have opened up in Ethiopia. However many question its quality and relevance and if equal access is given to all of the nation’s citizens. There is an ongoing debate on whether to focus on quantity or quality when it comes to educating people so they can be brought out of poverty. Education consultant Samuel Asnake Wolle, 54, argues that “visionary leadership, regular supervision, staff motivation, adequate financing, effective communication and auditing are the key tools in increasing the effectiveness of education.” Capital’s Reporter Tesfaye Getnet talked with Samuel to get his opinion on how to improve Ethiopia’s educational system.
He received his BA, MA and PhD in Educational Administration. He studied at the University of South Africa (UNISA). Since 1982, he has worked in the educational system serving as a teacher, school director, teacher training professor and national and international NGOs. Currently, he works with the UN coordinates education programmes for one UN agency. The responses to this exclusive interview are his personal views. Excerpts:

 

Capital: If you were given the opportunity to prioritize the agenda at the the Ministry of Education, what one thing would you want to change in our education sector?
Samuel Asnake: I understand education like an embracing living plant with a number of roots anchored the base to yield edible healthy fruit for life. In this regard, every part of the plant, as a system, has the specific role to play towards the cultivation of the desired fruit. Yet, the external environment including the soil and water in which the plant functions meaningfully affects the quality and quantity of the fruit. Hence, a change on one element of the system does not guarantee obtaining the desired fruit we aspire. Nevertheless, as you are looking into my eyes and insisting me get my personal views to your question; then I shall decide one. That is changing educational leaders and teachers’ development. I have a reason for it. In my view education is a process of nurturing and cultivating the human person into a precious asset and capital for the rest of all the societal fabrics. Teaching is neither talking nor telling, rather it is a process of cultivating human personality towards desired behavioural actions characterized by confidence competence and excellence for a difference in personal and societal life. From my experience, schools are up to their leaders and students are up to their teachers. If you have motivated and well trained school leaders and teachers, then you managed half of the problem. Such dedicated and trained education personnel make the learning creative, joyful and effective even in the absence of learning inputs and resources.

Capital: What is your opinion on the educational system in Ethiopia and its effectiveness?
Samuel: I am not sure that I’m the right person to give an answer to this question as it is too general. Such general questions are less helpful and usually lead to confused interpretations even if the responder tries their level best not to go out of track. Yet we all are cognizant that the government is well aware of the agenda and working on it by inviting all members of the society. Perhaps initiating genuine discussion on our collective roles and contributions seems more sound and meaningful than rating the obvious.
Having said this, as an expert, I would like to make a very simple personal response. In my view, four fundamental pillars that determine the essence of any education system of the citizens of the nation: Educational Philosophy, the core Principles, the Policy in purpose and the Educational Planning. If the bedrock, i.e. the education philosophy is clearly defined in context and communicated well in a language clear to the commons then we know our common destiny and at least will not be ineffective on our investment in education. Based on this foundation we can then build the remaining three that constitute the education system. Educational Effectiveness is the sum total of a number of learning inputs and processes concerted in the learners’ lives smoothly aligned at the school , home or market place and applied in due process. Learning effectiveness must be checked and be assured in each day and session; not by the end of the completion of the level or graduation to the world of work. In my view the key point lies on shared roles and responsibilities at all levels. Amidst, trained and motivated teachers are serious in making each learning session to be effective.

(Photo: Anteneh Aklilu)

Capital: Currently the government of Ethiopia is drafting a new education road map to change the current curriculum. What is your thought about this and what needs do you to see in the new curriculum?
Samuel: Still I have the opinion that this question is too general; also highly related to the earlier question. With regard to the question, I have the feeling that the government is not changing a curriculum for the sake of changing it. Rather, placing the current educational problems at the center of the discourse, is doing quite remarkable job on the redefining the fundamentals including the purpose and role of education to bring social cohesion and social transformation. This process, in my view is not like model car replacing the old by new; but building on the existing basic educational and learning elements that are reputable endure and bridge the diverse needs and aspirations of the society towards our common way and destiny. Hence, it requires careful and rigorous task in designing and developing the curriculum framework that allows the indigenous knowledge systems, upholds home grown societal values, practices and harmonizes with the global ones. Here I would like to reiterate that, the shift from knowledge-based learning to competency based learning strictly requires joyful and attractive learning environment where the learners are at the center of the learning process. This in turn requires professionally trained and motivated teachers, who are dedicated to help the children learn through exploring their talents, enjoy in the learning games and build new desirable educational behaviours. In this regard, it is essential to rethink on the current situation of schools and universities.

Capital: In an era where students are mainly concerned about grades and certificates what can be done to get qualified graduates who will do something to change their country’s development.
Samuel: I have reservations on your question, as it requires deep scrutiny and analysis. Yet, I personally have the feeling that every behaviour is built on a given mind set and attitude learned from the surrounding environment. In this regard, the main problem is not that of the learners; rather the system that tends to give more value to a paper certificate, favouritism than actual competence; more value to loyalty (for example affiliation) than the merit. In my view, it is about accountability. Hence, I suggest the upcoming education reform will consider an inbuilt educational accountability mechanisms at all levels.
In my view improving accountability (legal, social, ethical, professional) demands visionary leadership, regular supervision, staff motivation, adequate financing, effective communication and auditing. Leadership provides vision for transformation. Supervisor provides techniques that assist educational leaders that help them foster the professional growth of key actors in the system. Motivating the staff energizes forces behind the actual activities, while allocating adequate funding along with sound auditing system helps to ensure efficiency and quality service delivery. On top of this, educational leaders are required to keep good morals of their employees with the intention of obtaining maximum efficiency and effectiveness through effective communication, which would serve as a parameter for sound accountability.

Capital: There are many children especially in far remote areas who wish to go to school but the schools are not available in the first place. Even where there are schools, there are few teachers, lack of infrastructure and even labor to do it. What are the ways to overcome these challenges?
Samuel: I think this question also requires clear ground, data and information. Equally, we need to be clear about the definition of child/children in context. In any case, we need to begin with appreciative inquiry. Despite the challenges, Ethiopia has made remarkable efforts during the last decades to overcome the age-old backlogs, improve educational access and narrow the gap between regions-urban and rural communities. Yet, the issue of quality, in particular ensuring inclusive education to children with disabilities and special needs is a serious challenge regardless of the geographic location. Educational problems require collective efforts toward lasting solutions.
Coming to your question, in my view, the more the distance from the center the fewer the services and the higher the challenges including safe and secure space to live. Hence, in remote areas, it is likely that schools lack teachers and experience educational wastage including high dropouts right from grade one. The best solution is promoting and accelerating inclusive development that ensure communities including at the hinterland have the benefits. With the penetration of technologies, exploring digital and mobile learning that easily help children learn seem highly advisable. In due process, it is also essential to engaging the communities, in particular the local leaders to support the education of their children and adults through recognizing and assisting those dedicated teachers/facilitators or volunteers working around. Equally, initiating multimodal learning approaches including flexible and tailored lessons that boost indigenous knowledge systems, life skills intergenerational learning both in form of family literacy learning and education are vital.

Capital: When thinking about lifelong learning, how important is early childhood development in helping every child to fulfil their potential when they go to school and beyond?
Samuel: Many studies confirm that lifelong learning begins from the womb. At the same time, educational psychologists reiterate that nurturing the infant at the pregnancy and at early childhood have pivotal influence and implications to talent search and overall personality development. Therefore, the question is not about thinking whether it is good or bad; rather how we make it work in our context. Exploring and mobilizing available local resources and strengthening our collaboration toward common goal is essential. Therefore, I kindly suggest family literacy learning and strengthening community-learning centres in which the family-schools and communities help every child to fulfil their potentials.

Capital: Teachers are complaining that the very low salary is not motivating them to stay long in their position, on the other hand government says it is not financially capable to increase their salary on a dramatic level: How can we close the gap of the two scenarios?
Samuel: I personally view that teaching is an art and science of cultivating the generation with a purpose and passion. If the right ones took the role, teaching is the most prestigious profession to building the human capital that determines the future of your society and country. While you teach, you learn and grow! That is why those dedicated teachers remain good role models, best readers and ever younger even if they serve for many years. Yet teachers are humans experience the same pains and possibilities like others serving in the other sectors and hence expect salary. However, salary alone is not a motivator and game changer. Other incentives including recognition to the good work, safe and secure workspace and environment, health packages and related ones equally relevant.

Capital: Some expert in the education sector say that the Ethiopian exam system in schools and universities are testing the memory of the students not their abilities of understanding the topics. What are your comments regarding this issue?
Samuel: From my experience, the curriculum framework sets minimum learning competency/ies that address the essential learning behaviours (cognitive/knowledge, affective/attitude, and psychomotor/skills) to be obtained because of the learning process. Keeping these into account, and considering the age of learners and context of learning, a good teacher prepares his/her lesson plan with clear objective and an inbuilt methodology and assessment mechanisms. If the school situation is not favourable, resources are scare or lacking and the teacher is under pressure then he may move only to assigning the memory perhaps through oral question and mass response.

Capital: Vocational schools are getting great focus to assist the industry of the country but still investors are not satisfied with the quality of the vocational graduates .what can be done to improve this problem?
Samuel: I think the problem is conceptual, institutional and technological. There are still wrong perceptions that consider technical and vocational training area is for the weak and low profile. We all need to work to changing this wrong perception. Institutional capacity and collaboration need to be boosted so that companies understand that the young is their valuable asset and well come the young trainees for practical exposure. Thirdly, investors leave no room for wastage as they are for profit; hence require competent and qualify workers with required occupational standards. On the other hand, the TVET institutes in particular in the rural communities are hardly in a position to fulfil the trainer and train the young with the required machine and technology. In addition to the technical skills, the issue of work discipline and communication /teamwork seem serious concern that TVET institutions need to address together with home /family.

The Africa we all want: an Africa of opportunities

0

Let’s fast-forward a moment, to 2063: a century after launching the first African continental initiative –the Organisation of African Unity that we commemorate today – Africa is an integrated continent, reaping the benefits of inclusive growth and sustainable development. The continent is peaceful and safe. Access to basic social services is guaranteed for all. Human rights, good governance and the rule of law prevail. On the world scene, Africa is a strong, influential player and partner.
This is not a fantasy, this is the vision you set out as your objective in the African Union’s Agenda 2063. This is the Africa you are building. An Africa of opportunities. An Africa we all want.
We can feel the winds of change blowing across the continent – from the historic peace agreements in the Horn region and the peaceful end of some totalitarian regimes, to the decision to set up an African continental free-trade area. Africa is a continent on the rise.
The continent’s economic pulse is beating faster. It is the world’s second fastest growing region, bursting with energy and dynamism. New commercial opportunities abound. Investments are growing rapidly.
Over the past five years, I have witnessed this change as European Commissioner for International Cooperation and Development. I have seen with my own eyes how Africa has increased its presence on the world stage. Full of confidence, aware of its economic, strategic, natural and human potential.
Making Africa’s 2063 vision a reality will be a long and continuous process requiring commitment from all concerned, at all levels and across frontiers. Setbacks might and will happen. You can trust my European experience on that. But is there any other way?
One thing is however sure: Europe is Africa’s long-standing partner and is willing to remain so. Africa is Europe’s twin continent. No matter what you may hear, Europe is Africa’s main and sustainable ally in business, its biggest trading partner and its leading investor, far ahead of any other region in the world. It is also our firm belief that a stronger Africa is good for Europe. We can only win by reinforcing our neighbours.
This means that charity has no place in our partnership. It is about sharing risks together and boosting Africa’s potential to achieve sustainable development: the kind of development that can stay the course and deliver long term opportunities for all. The kind of development that can offer African and European businesses new opportunities on both sides of the Mediterranean sea.
That is why Europe needs an Africa of opportunities.
I reckon the Africa-Europe relationship has grown and matured over the last years. From a donor-to-recipient dependency, it has evolved to a partnership of equals and it is now more and more looking like an “Alliance”, as European Commission President Juncker said when he launched in September 2018 the new Africa-Europe Alliance for Sustainable Investment and Jobs.
The Alliance’s ultimate aim is to boost investment and create jobs, notably for young Africans. Let me reassure you; this is not another label given to a political initiative. The Alliance will come up with concrete results on the ground. Our leveraged investments will help create 10 million jobs in Africa over the next five years.
The Alliance also means that co-operating and building together offer better chances to find the solution we need for our future. Our common future. Together, Africa and Europe can shape the international agenda. Together we can make a difference. If Europe misses this rendez-vous with Africa, it will miss its rendez-vous with History. And I dare to say the opposite is also true; make no mistake: Europe is your natural ally.
The degree to which we make a success of the Alliance will depend on how we translate these initiatives into real and lasting change for the people on the ground.
Doing this will require African and European commitment alike. I know that we are all capable of that commitment. But there is no time to waste: 2063 is now.

Neven Mimica
European Commissioner for International Cooperation and Development

The politics of US-China trade war

When President Donald Trump suddenly hiked tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese imports two weeks ago, China said it would respond with “necessary countermeasures.” But then it announced a tariff increase on just $60 billion of United States goods. China simply doesn’t import enough from the United States to match tariffs “tit-for-tat,” hence the $140 billion shortfall in its retaliation.
Eamon Barrett wrote on Fortune Magazine that China’s softening economy coupled with the fallout of increased export tariffs will put downward pressure on its official currency, the renminbi, which is also referred to as the yuan. The central government has tended to prop up the renminbi in recent years to spur China’s transition to a consumption-led economy. However Chen Long, a China economist at consultancy Gavekal Dragonomics, argues it is now in Beijing’s best interest to let the renminbi slide.
Financial Times newspaper last week reported that as Walmart delivered a stark warning last week that President Donald Trump’s widening trade war with China would lead to higher prices for American consumers, John Flynn stood in front of one of the US retailer’s stores in Virginia defiantly defending the US president. “I think he’s doing the right thing, America is becoming very dependent on stuff from China,” said Mr Flynn, a 55-year-old real estate agent who grew up in the steel country of western Pennsylvania. “If prices go up, prices go up. It’s going to hurt the Chinese in the long run too. So it’s just a matter of who blinks first,”he said, as he stepped into his Honda Accord.
Mr Flynn’s words from the parking lot in Manassas, near the site of the first major land battle of the American civil war, will give President Trump comfort that he can prevail in the biggest economic gamble of his presidency. The standard line from President Donald Trump and those who support his get-tough approach toward Beijing is that because China sells more to the U.S. than the other way around, Washington has the upper hand in its game of tariffs. “China buys MUCH less from us than we buy from them,”Trump recently tweeted, “so we are in a fantastic position.”
According to Michael Schuman, the author of The Miracle: The Epic Story of Asia’s Quest for Wealth and Confucius: And the World He Created, statistically, that’s true. The United States exported only $120 billion worth of goods to China in 2018, compared with the $540 billion it imported. China has a lot less stuff to tax, so the amount of damage it can inflict on the American economy and business through tariffs is much more limited. That view seemed confirmed when China announced a surprisingly moderate package of new duties in retaliation for President Trump’s latest broadside. While United States hiked tariffs from 10 percent to 25 percent on $200 billion of Chinese products, and is threatening to slap on even more, China responded by increasing tariffs on only about $60 billion of American goods.
Michael Schuman strongly argued that in practice, though, the fight is not as uneven as the trade, China has many weapons at its disposal beyond tariffs to make life miserable for American chief executives. The intrusive Chinese state has all sorts of levers to control the economy and society, and in an environment that lacks rule of law, officials can pull them at their pleasure. They also have far more targets to aim at than the trade data suggests. Many American companies have substantial operations within China that are tremendously important to their bottom lines. General Motors and its partners, for instance, sold more than 3.6 million vehicles in China last year, almost all of them manufactured locally. Starbucks operates more coffee shops in China than in any other market aside from the United States. These businesses are vulnerable to government-inspired nefariousness, from product boycotts and state-press smear campaigns to regulatory investigations.
Tom Clifford, an Irish journalist based in Beijing analysed that the trade spat between the United States and China isn’t about deficits or tariffs. It’s about Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Ohio, Michigan. The view from China is that Republicans and Democrats are united in using China as a bogeyman because they need someone to blame. President Donald Trump’s anti-China message helped him win these states, and he knows that the path to a second term in the White House, Oval Office door runs through these states in 2020.
President Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama believed that China’s integration into the global economy would lead it to democratize and that United States dominance at China’s doorstep in East Asia would continue. According to Tom Clifford, it was a miscalculation that bordered on the naive. Domestically, China has been increasingly repressive since Xi Jinping became president, but its economy has gradually opened up.
As the United States Chamber of Commerce in 2018 stated in a study on intellectual property: “Unlike many of its developing economy peers, China is making concrete progress in building a 21st century national IP environment.” The reason for this is not based on altruism, but on reality. Chinese companies have gotten better at invention. Consequently, China has a stake in creating a legal system that protects inventions from being ripped off.
Philip Bowring, an Asia-based journalist, formerly the editor of the Far Eastern Economic Review and columnist for the International Herald Tribune stated that China has one great fear – the “middle-income trap.” This could trigger political instability. The unwritten agreement between China and the Chinese people is: You stay out of politics, we’ll make it worth your while. In practical terms, this means that rising wages must not undermine the advantage of China as a center of low-cost manufacturing before it develops the capacity to produce higher-value goods. Assembling, the rationale goes, must be replaced by inventing. Otherwise economic growth will stagnate and popular unrest will follow.
According to Philip Bowring, China controversially requires many United States companies to create joint ventures with Chinese firms in order to sell to Chinese consumers. How could they? It’s akin to stealing in American eyes. A White House report last year cited these joint ventures as evidence of “How China’s economic aggression threatens the technologies and intellectual property of the United States and the world.” But this is not unusual. According to the United States Chamber of Commerce, which last year ranked 50 countries on how well they protect the intellectual property of foreign companies, China ranked above Turkey, Brazil, South Africa and the Philippines, just below Mexico and six places below Canada.
Tom Clifford suggest a better safety net as the homemade solution for Americans. Retaining health care if they become unemployed, retraining programs, an option to be able to send their children to college without incurring massive debt, would greatly lessen hardship in the world’s leading economy. These surely are the issues that should be addressed with at least as much vigor as tariffs on Chinese goods.
Tom Clifforg also noted that China too has problems, many of them similar to those of Americans. High medical costs, exorbitant college fees, inadequate social security and migrant workers from rural areas who are denied basic services after they arrive in major cities looking for work. But it has brought the vast majority of its population out of dire poverty.
The China threat has galvanized American politicians, but sadly mostly for playing blame games. China is not perfect, far from it, and it has challenges that it must overcome. Does it try to use trade to its own advantage? Certainly. Is it alone in this? Certainly not. China is changing and no one can say for sure how these changes will play out. But China is not America’s problem. It may even be part of the solution. But you won’t hear that on the campaign trail.