Monday, September 29, 2025
Home Blog Page 496

Managing Consultancies

0

One thing I have learnt over the years is that you cannot go it alone. I have never been able to manage projects or programmes without the support and input of others. By others I don’t only mean workers or staff. No, I refer also to people who in one way or the other have advised me how to go about things. Often this advice was provided in an informal way, out of office and working hours. And most of the time by people who cared about me or about the activities I was engaged in. Many times, I have also hired professionals for a short period of time to advise me on specific issues I was dealing with. I have hired consultants to evaluate programmes, to facilitate a strategic planning process, to carry out an audit, etc. I have had good experiences and I have had bad experiences. Sometimes it clicks and sometimes it doesn’t. Sometimes the informal advisor is more effective than the hired consultant. What is it that makes the difference? Consultancy services have developed into an industry, also here in Ethiopia. Consultants are hired all the time and paid for their services; it is a business. Clients who buy a service expect and deserve quality; after all they pay for it. Some consultants are hired repeatedly by the same organizations or business; others are hired one time only and need to look for another client again. So, what is it that makes the difference between a good and a mediocre consultant?

Let us look at it from the perspective of the client, a managing director of an organization or business for instance, who is looking for advice as to what needs improvement in the management and how to go about it. Often though it may not be the initiative of the company but a requirement of a third party like a donor organization, the board, the authorities, that a consultant is hired for a certain task. In any case, the client, our managing director may develop some of the following feelings:

  • Not being sure whether the consultant who is hired is the best choice.
  • Emotionally uncomfortable to sensitive issues in the hands of somebody else.
  • A feeling of losing control.
  • Worried. Suggestions for improvement imply that things haven’t been managed well.
  • Exposed, some personal information will be revealed.
  • Concerned that the consultant will not understand the specific circumstances.
  • Suspicious, that the consultant will not deliver, loose interest and focus more on other clients.

These are serious emotions and if some of these fears come through, it is no wonder that the consultant’s advice will not be heard, that the report will be shelved, that the client will be defensive and reject the advice. These emotions need to be appreciated and dealt with in an effective way, so that the services will indeed lead to welcome advice. A relationship needs to be built, a relationship between client and consultant.

An effective relationship between client and consultant is one in which there is a reasonable degree of contact at both emotional and task level. There are three basic issues here, which need to be managed for the relationship to be effective:

1. Level of anxiety. When the level of anxiety is very high or very low, the client will find it difficult to accept any new information or advice from the consultant. At medium level the client will find it easier to change or accept new information.

2. Level of trust.  Trust refers to the extent to which a client is willing to be vulnerable in relation to the consultant. To give trust usually means giving up control. Where trust is low the client will be reluctant to provide valid information and data.

3. Degree of credibility. Credibility is achieved through investing in the client and does not only depend on the knowledge and expertise of the consultant. Sometimes people with a great reputation have low credibility simply because they refer to a different value system than the client.

In order to manage these variables effectively, the levels of trust and credibility should increase, and the level of anxiety should decrease. In addition to this the consultant needs to build a relationship with the client on the task that is at hand. 

Giving advice, being an effective consultant is therefore not easy, it is in fact complex material with a lot of psychology involved. There are skills involved that are not taught in formal education, but that are critical to success. Most important of these skills is for the consultant to get the client to trust him or her. Without that trust the consultancy assignment is doomed to fail from the start. Consultants need to be aware of the skills required to be effective and they need to work on developing these essential skills. Trust needs to be earned.

Ton Haverkort

ton.haverkort@gmail.com

PS. Suggested reading on this topic: “THE TRUSTED ADVISOR” by David Maister, Charles Green and Robert Galford.

Africa’s Business Heroes Announces 2024 Top 10 Finalists Following First Event in North Africa

0

The Africa’s Business Heroes (ABH) (www.AfricaBusinessHeroes.org) Prize Competition, Africa’s leading philanthropic initiative supported by the Jack Ma Foundation (http://apo-opa.co/3Y3GTt8) and Alibaba Philanthropy, is proud to announce the Top 10 finalists for the 2024 ABH Prize.

These exceptional entrepreneurs were chosen after an intense round of Semi-Final business pitches and judging held on September 27-28 at Kamelizer Spaces (http://apo-opa.co/3TNPjCz), with community events until September 29, all in the historic city of Cairo, Egypt. This marks ABH’s first event in North Africa, highlighting Egypt’s growing role as a key hub of entrepreneurial innovation in Africa.

The Top 10 finalists are (in alphabetical order, by country): 

Tisya Mukuna, Founder&CEO, La Kinoise (La boite) – Democratic Republic of the Congo | www.La-Kinoise.com
Hadeel Fayek, Founder&CEO, Joviality – Egypt | www.Intl.Joviality-eg.com
Mina Shahid, Co-founder&CEO, Numida – Egypt | www.Numida.com 
Dr. Rasha Rady, Co-founder&COO, Chefaa – Egypt | www.Chefaa.health
Clement Owusu-Donkor, Founder&CEO, Aquantuo – Ghana | www.Aquantuo.com
Alexander Odhiambo, Founder&CEO, Solutech Limited – Kenya | www.Solutech.co.ke
Dr. Salma Bougarrani, Co-Founder&CEO, GREEN WATECH – Morocco | www.GreenWatech.com
Mobolaji Ajayi, Founder&CEO, Purelife Pharmacy – Nigeria | www.PurelifePharmacy.ng
Henri Ousmane Gueye, Co-founder&CEO, EYONE – Senegal | www.Eyone.net
Maxima Nsimenta, Co-founder&CEO, LIVARA – Uganda | www.myLivara.com

The 2024 ABH Top 10 entrepreneurs were identified through a rigorous process involving multiple rounds of interviews and assessments. Starting from around 20,000 applications from all 54 African countries, the pool was narrowed to the Top 50 finalists. Following another selection round involving video call interviews with expert judges, ABH identified the Top 20 finalists who attended the Semi-Final in Cairo. At these Semi-Finals, the Top 10 finalists to receive their share of the $1.5 million USD grant were selected. These finalists represent eight nations: three from Egypt, the host country of the 2024 ABH Semi-Final, as well as entrepreneurs from Ghana, Kenya, Morocco, Nigeria, Senegal, Uganda, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, which is represented for the first time this year.

Their ventures span a diverse range of industries, including Agriculture, Education and Training, Financial Services, Health care, ICT, Logistics, Manufacturing and Retail. All the Top 10 finalists have been vetted through a due diligence process led by PlusVC (http://apo-opa.co/3XP16BA) and were selected after pitching their ventures to a panel of judges in front of a live audience.

Hosting the Semi-Final event in Cairo highlighted the city’s longstanding legacy in commerce, trade, and entrepreneurship. Known for its rich history, Egypt plays a critical role in promoting entrepreneurship and supporting the next generation of African business leaders.

“We chose Cairo as the location for this important stage of the competition because of its vibrant entrepreneurial ecosystem and its strategic position in the African market,” said Zahra Baitie-Boateng, Managing Director, Africa at Africa’s Business Heroes.

“The remarkable growth of Egypt’s entrepreneurial community is evident from our experience over the past six years at ABH. We have seen 34 Egyptian entrepreneurs progress through various stages of the competition, from the Top 50 to the Top 10, including two third prize winners, one second prize winner and one grand prize winner. These achievements, among others, underscore Egypt’s influence within the continent’s broader entrepreneurial landscape, and we are proud to showcase its significance,” she added.

The Semi-Final event featured an esteemed panel of judges, including Hasan Haider (http://apo-opa.co/3Y56zW8) Founder and Managing Partner at PlusVC (http://apo-opa.co/3XP16BA), Fatoumata Doro (http://apo-opa.co/3Y0Bjb0), Former Managing Director at Vlisco and Board Member at Ecobank, Dina el-Shenoufy (http://apo-opa.co/3zBJzow), Chief Investment Officer at Flat6Labs, and Simbarashe Mhungu (http://apo-opa.co/3XSP1eW), an Executive Director in Agriculture and Infrastructure Finance. The event, which attracted participants from across the continent also featured community-focused events. These included a networking cruise on the Nile, sponsored and co-hosted with The FutureList (http://apo-opa.co/4enP8pM), and a training session on building a future-proof business, led by industry experts with additional training from Alibaba Cloud. Other sponsors included Kamelizer Spaces (http://apo-opa.co/3TNPjCz), while partners such as Career180 (http://apo-opa.co/4eqs3Ti), Helm (http://apo-opa.co/3XKvNrF), Satguru (http://apo-opa.co/4eqs5KU), ALX Ventures (http://apo-opa.co/3Y1BeUt) and RiseUp Summit (http://apo-opa.co/3Y2mYL9) were also involved – highlighting the collaboration of key players from Egypt’s entrepreneurial ecosystem and beyond, all working together to support African entrepreneurs.

In a statement shared following the unveiling of the Top 10 at the Gala Dinner concluding the Semi-Final, Baitie-Boateng further noted, “We continue to see inspiring examples of innovation and resilience among the ABH finalists, and this year’s cohort is no different. These entrepreneurs have overcome significant challenges and are building businesses that contribute to their local economies and beyond.”

The Grand Finale and Summit in Kigali, Rwanda

The finalists will now compete for a share of the US$1.5 million prize at the Grand Finale, which is set to take place from December 3-5, 2024, in Kigali, Rwanda.

The event, which will also be partially live-streamed, will bring together leading investors, business leaders, and innovators from across Africa. It will feature a variety of activities, including keynote speeches, workshops, an entrepreneurial showcase, and a live pitch competition, among other exciting sessions.

ABH has indicated that the 2024 Grand Finale will stay true to the initiative’s core values since its launch in 2019. Emphasizing its pan-African commitment, the event will spotlight inclusivity, sector-diversity, and grassroots innovation. This high-profile gathering will highlight entrepreneurs who are   addressing some of the continent’s most pressing challenges while driving sustainable economic growth across Africa.

Join the ABH Journey

The ABH community invites stakeholders, investors, and partners to stay engaged as the competition progresses. Registration for the Grand Finale and Summit in Kigali is now open. Visit www.AfricaBusinessHeroes.org to learn more and be part of the journey towards identifying Africa’s Business Heroes.

Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Africa’s Business Heroes (ABH).

Why African Ministries of Health Should Support the Pan African Supply Chain Awards

0

As Africa strides towards self-reliance in health security, the Pan African Supply Chain Awards emerge as a crucial platform. These Awards not only recognise and incentivise local health product manufacturing excellence, but also play a significant role in achieving the African Union’s ambitious target of producing 60% of the Continent’s vaccines by 2040. Your support can make a difference in this monumental journey.

Supporting the Pan African Supply Chain Awards is a strategic move for African Ministries of Health. The Awards recognises and incentivise excellence in local manufacturing and align with the African Union’s ambitious health and economic goals. These Awards pave the way for a healthier, more self-reliant Africa by fostering innovation, reducing costs, and supporting local manufacturers. The prescription is clear for a continent striving towards health security and economic prosperity: celebrate and support local production.

The upcoming Pan African Supply Chain Awards, set to take place on 26 October in Johannesburg, South Africa, will bring together supply chain professionals and key figures in the health sector. This prestigious event, supported by health ministries across the Continent, celebrates projects significantly advancing local health product manufacturing.

With the growing demand for locally produced medicines, vaccines, and other health products, the awards recognise initiatives that have built sustainable supply chains and improved healthcare outcomes. By shining a light on these pioneering efforts, the Pan African Supply Chain Awards showcase models that can be replicated to boost manufacturing and distribution capacity across Africa.

The Pan African Supply Chain Awards are mainly focused on addressing challenges in the pharmaceutical sector, where the ability to manufacture and distribute medicines efficiently is essential to tackling health crises. The Awards aim to inspire further innovation and development in health supply chains, by recognising the best practices in this area.

This event is a key opportunity for health ministries to highlight their contributions and encourage investment in local production, ultimately ensuring that Africa becomes more self-sufficient in meeting its healthcare needs.

The Pan African Supply Chain Awards celebrate projects significantly contributing to local health product manufacturing. By recognising these efforts, the Awards highlight successful models and best practices that can be replicated across the Continent. This recognition is vital for several reasons:

  1. Highlighting successful projects encourages further investment in local manufacturing. For instance, the African Vaccine Manufacturing Accelerator (AVMA) has committed up to $1 billion to support vaccine manufacturing in Africa, underscoring the importance of financial backing for local initiatives.
  2. Countries that excel in increasing locally produced health products and technologies set a benchmark for others. For example, the establishment of nine commercial-scale production facilities and the commitment of three manufacturers to produce eight vaccines for the African market by 2030 are milestones worth celebrating.
  3. The Awards recognise projects that reduce dependency on global supply chains, ensuring timely and equitable access to life-saving products. This is crucial, as Africa meets only 0.1% of its vaccine demand through local production.
  4. The Awards contribute to reducing the disease burden on the Continent, by fostering local production. The AVMA, for instance, aims to improve Africa’s resilience to pandemics and other health emergencies, directly supporting the AU’s health security goals.
  5. Producing vaccines and other health products locally can reduce costs significantly. The AVMA’s subsidies, payable upon WHO prequalification and successful delivery, are designed to offset high initial production costs, making local manufacturing economically viable. The development of the pool procurement framework and now under the leadership of The Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) is an indication of strong leadership by the African Union to ensure that the African Union’s goal of achieving universal health is realised and creates a sustainable market of 1.5 billion people  – with around 40 per cent of the population aged 15 years and younger.
  6. The implementation of a pool procurement mechanism is expected to create predictable demand for local manufacturers to plan their production lines and secure the required funding and partnership from government and international manufacturers that meet the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP). Developing a robust pharmaceutical manufacturing sector can create millions of jobs and stimulate economic growth. The African Development Bank estimates loca
  7. l manufacturing could create up to 16 million jobs by 2030, contributing to broader economic development.
  8. The African Pooled Procurement Mechanism (APPM) aims to aggregate demand and provide direct access to quality medicines, promoting manufacturing localisation. This initiative ensures that local manufacturers have a stable market for their products.
  9. Projects that streamline regulatory processes and ensure quality standards must be recognised. The African Medicines Agency (AMA) operationalisation is crucial for this, as it helps ensure that locally manufactured health products meet global quality standards.

South Africa’s National Health Insurance (NHI) system exemplifies the benefits of supporting local health product manufacturing. By prioritising local production, the NHI can reduce costs, improve access, and ensure a stable supply of essential medicines. This model can be replicated across the Continent to achieve similar benefits.

Health ministries’ role is pivotal in encouraging collaboration between the public and private sectors, enhancing local manufacturing capabilities. The Awards ceremony applauds successful projects and serves as a platform for knowledge-sharing and partnership-building.’’

Kamogelo Mampane is Chairperson of Supply Chain Council and CEO of TK Global Experts

The dilemma of prioritizing aesthetics over economic vitality in urban planning

0

Urban planning is a delicate balance between various competing interests, among which aesthetics and economic vitality are often at the forefront. While a visually appealing cityscape is essential for creating a pleasant living environment and attracting tourism, prioritizing aesthetics over economic vitality can have unintended consequences. This article explores the implications of this trade-off, examining the potential risks of favoring beauty at the expense of economic sustainability.

Aesthetics in urban design involves creating spaces that are visually pleasing, culturally expressive, and reflective of a city’s identity. Beautiful public spaces, iconic architecture, and well-maintained green areas contribute to a city’s attractiveness, making it a desirable place to live, work, and visit.

The aesthetic appeal of a city can: Enhance Quality of Life: Attractive public spaces offer residents and visitors areas for relaxation, recreation, and social interaction, improving the overall quality of life. Boost Tourism: Cities known for their beauty, such as Paris, Venice, or Kyoto, draw millions of tourists each year, significantly contributing to the local economy. Foster Community Pride: Aesthetic improvements can instill a sense of pride among residents, encouraging greater community involvement and stewardship.

While the benefits of a visually appealing city are clear, there are significant risks associated with prioritizing aesthetics over economic vitality: Economic Displacement and Gentrification: When urban planning focuses heavily on beautification without considering the economic implications, gentrification can occur.

As neighborhoods are transformed into more aesthetically pleasing areas, property values tend to rise, leading to higher rents and living costs. This often results in the displacement of lower-income residents and small businesses, who can no longer afford to stay in the area. The original community fabric may be lost, replaced by a more affluent, but less diverse, population.

Neglect of Essential Infrastructure: In some cases, the focus on aesthetics can lead to the neglect of essential infrastructure. For example, investing heavily in public art, streetscaping, and decorative elements may come at the expense of necessary investments in transportation, utilities, or affordable housing. Over time, this can undermine the city’s economic vitality, as inadequate infrastructure can deter businesses and residents from settling or remaining in the area.

Short-Term Gains vs. Long-Term Sustainability: Aesthetically driven projects may yield short-term gains, such as increased tourism or media attention, but these benefits may not be sustainable in the long run. If the economic foundation of a city is weak, the beautification efforts may eventually fail to maintain their appeal, leading to a decline in investment and interest. For instance, a city that spends millions on a visually striking but economically unviable project may find itself burdened with maintenance costs that it cannot afford, leading to urban decay.

Exclusion of Practical Needs: Aesthetic considerations can sometimes overshadow practical needs, leading to urban designs that are beautiful but impractical. For instance, a focus on pedestrian-friendly spaces may inadvertently reduce accessibility for businesses that rely on vehicular traffic for deliveries or customer access. Similarly, prioritizing the preservation of historical architecture without considering the needs for modernization can make it difficult for businesses to adapt to contemporary demands, stifling economic growth.

Imbalance in Resource Allocation: Prioritizing aesthetics can lead to an imbalance in resource allocation, where funds that could be used for economic development, social services, or infrastructure improvements are instead funneled into beautification projects. This can exacerbate existing economic inequalities, as wealthier areas receive more investment in aesthetics while economically disadvantaged areas are left with inadequate resources to address fundamental issues such as unemployment, education, and healthcare.

The key to successful urban planning lies in finding a balance between aesthetics and economic vitality. Cities can achieve this by: Engaging with Stakeholders: Urban planners should actively engage with a wide range of stakeholders, including local businesses, residents, and community organizations, to ensure that aesthetic projects align with the economic needs and aspirations of the community.

Focusing on Multifunctional Spaces: Urban design can prioritize multifunctional spaces that are both beautiful and economically vibrant. For example, public squares can be designed to accommodate markets, events, and other activities that generate economic activity while enhancing the aesthetic appeal of the area.

Prioritizing Inclusive Development: Aesthetic improvements should be part of broader, inclusive development strategies that prioritize affordable housing, accessible transportation, and job creation. This ensures that all residents benefit from beautification efforts, rather than just a select few.

Sustainable Investments: Cities should prioritize sustainable investments that not only enhance aesthetics but also contribute to long-term economic stability. This includes infrastructure projects that support business growth, education, and workforce development, alongside beautification efforts.

To conclude, while aesthetics play an important role in urban planning, prioritizing them over economic vitality can lead to significant challenges, including gentrification, neglect of essential infrastructure, and economic decline. To create cities that are both beautiful and economically vibrant, urban planners must strive for a balanced approach that integrates aesthetic considerations with the practical needs of the community. By doing so, cities can ensure that their beautification efforts contribute to long-term prosperity and inclusivity, rather than just temporary visual appeal.